Sanctions Compliance · Venezuela Energy Sector

OFAC General License 44A vs GL 8M: Which Venezuela Oil License Applies?

GL 44A opened Venezuela's oil sector to any qualifying entity — when it was in force. GL 8M is narrower: maintenance-only access, limited to five named oilfield service companies. Here is how compliance teams tell them apart.

By Caracas Research Updated June 29, 2026 9 min read

Key Takeaways

  • OFAC General License 44A vs GL 8M represent two different policy approaches: GL 44A is a broad sector-wide authorization tied to political milestones; GL 8M is a narrowly scoped maintenance license for five named companies.
  • GL 44A covers any qualifying entity when active, authorizing oil and gas sector operations across the full value chain — but its status depends on Venezuela's compliance with the Barbados Agreement.
  • GL 8M covers only five companies by name: Chevron Corporation, Halliburton, Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes, and Weatherford — and only for maintenance of existing PdVSA operations.
  • Neither license authorizes new exploration, new drilling, or new oil-sector investment. New joint ventures are not covered by either.
  • Always verify current status on OFAC's Venezuela-Related Sanctions page before relying on either license. GL 44A in particular has experienced expiration and reissuance cycles tied to political developments.

Compliance teams working on Venezuela energy transactions frequently ask about OFAC General License 44A vs GL 8M in the same review. Both touch Venezuela's oil sector and both originate from OFAC's Venezuela sanctions program. But they emerge from different policy objectives and serve very different business profiles. GL 44A was designed as a sweeping sector-wide authorization, calibrated to political conditions in Caracas. GL 8M is an older, narrower instrument — a life-support mechanism that keeps a small set of named U.S. oilfield service companies connected to PdVSA infrastructure, but only for maintenance. Knowing which one applies to your activity — or whether either does — is a threshold compliance question.

This is not legal advice. Sanctions guidance changes fast, and general licenses are amended and revoked without much notice. Both GL 44A and GL 8M have histories of expiration, amendment, and reissuance. Always verify every provision against the current OFAC text on the Venezuela-Related Sanctions page and the official license PDFs before you act. When in doubt, seek qualified counsel.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Here is the quick comparison of OFAC General License 44A vs GL 8M across the seven dimensions a compliance team cares about most.

DimensionGeneral License 44AGeneral License 8M
Who it covers Any qualifying entity meeting OFAC conditions Only Chevron Corporation, Halliburton, Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes, and Weatherford
Authorized activities Oil and gas sector operations broadly (production, lifting, export, and related services) Maintenance of essential existing PdVSA operations only
Renewal mechanism Reissued based on political milestones (Barbados Agreement compliance) Periodic renewal, typically every 6–12 months, on OFAC's own review
New projects / exploration Not authorized Not authorized
Deals with non-named parties Yes, within sector scope (subject to SDN screening) Only with PdVSA for maintenance purposes; cannot extend to other entities
Operational latitude Covers the full value chain of oil operations when active Strictly limited to equipment upkeep and infrastructure maintenance
Current status (2026) Status tied to political cycle — verify current issuance against OFAC's Venezuela page Active (periodically renewed); check OFAC for latest renewal dates

Sources: OFAC GL 44A (April 2024) · OFAC Venezuela-Related Sanctions (GL 8M)

What GL 44A Authorizes

General License 44A carries the full title "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Oil or Gas Sector Operations in Venezuela." That title signals its ambition. When active, GL 44A is the most consequential general license in the Venezuelan energy space — it does not confine itself to a handful of named companies, and it does not limit its reach to maintenance work. It covers the oil and gas sector broadly.

Under GL 44A, any qualifying entity — not just one designated operator — can engage in transactions related to oil and gas sector operations in Venezuela. That scope extends across the value chain: production, lifting, export, and the services that support those activities. For companies that had historically been locked out of Venezuela's oil sector purely because of the general sanctions regime, GL 44A represented a significant opening, provided they met the conditions OFAC set.

The Political Conditionality Factor

GL 44A does not operate on a standard administrative renewal cycle. Its issuance and continuation are directly tied to Venezuela's compliance with electoral and political commitments negotiated under the Barbados Agreement — a framework reached in late 2023 between the Maduro government and Venezuelan opposition groups under international mediation. When the Venezuelan government is seen as meeting those commitments, OFAC has issued or renewed GL 44A. When the political situation deteriorates or commitments are not honored, GL 44A has expired without renewal.

This means the license has experienced on-again, off-again periods. Compliance teams cannot simply assume that because GL 44A existed at some point, it is currently active. The status must be verified against OFAC's Venezuela page before any reliance is placed on it. An activity that was lawful under an active GL 44A becomes unlawful the moment the license lapses and is not renewed — and OFAC does not always provide significant advance notice of expiration.

What GL 44A Does Not Cover

Even when GL 44A is fully in force, important boundaries apply. New exploration is not authorized. New investment in the oil sector — including formation of new joint ventures — falls outside the license's scope. Transactions with parties on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list remain prohibited regardless of what GL 44A says about sector operations. Compliance teams must conduct SDN screening on every counterparty, including PdVSA subsidiaries and third-party service providers, before any transaction proceeds. See our Venezuela sanctions checker for a starting point on counterparty screening.

For the broader context of why these restrictions exist in the first place, see our explainer on why Venezuela is sanctioned. For a full inventory of current Venezuela general licenses, the OFAC Venezuela General Licenses tool provides a structured reference.

Sources: OFAC GL 44A (April 2024) · OFAC Venezuela-Related Sanctions

What GL 8M Authorizes

General License 8M has a more modest mandate than GL 44A, and that modesty is intentional. Its full title — "Authorizing Transactions Involving Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) Necessary for the Limited Maintenance of Essential Operations in Venezuela" — describes its entire universe. Maintenance. Essential operations. Limited. These are the operative words.

OFAC designed GL 8M to allow a small set of U.S. oilfield service companies to remain operationally present in Venezuela without fully abandoning infrastructure that, if left unattended, would deteriorate rapidly. Venezuela's oil sector depends heavily on the equipment, technical expertise, and field presence of major U.S. service firms. GL 8M is the mechanism by which five such firms can continue to provide that upkeep.

The Five Named Companies

GL 8M's most important feature — and its most significant limitation — is that it is not open to the market. Only five specifically named companies may operate under it: Chevron Corporation, Halliburton, Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes, and Weatherford. These companies are named in the license text itself. No other U.S. company, regardless of its qualifications or experience in Venezuela, can rely on GL 8M.

Any other U.S. entity seeking to perform maintenance work involving PdVSA would need either a separate specific license from OFAC — which is rarely granted outside of humanitarian or wind-down contexts — or coverage under a different current general license, such as GL 46 for established U.S. entities. The five named companies occupy a privileged but strictly bounded position.

Maintenance Only — Not Production, Not Trading

GL 8M permits the five named companies to perform essential maintenance on existing PdVSA infrastructure and operations. Critically, it does not authorize oil production. It does not authorize lifting, export, or sale of Venezuelan oil. It does not cover oil trading or revenue-generating transactions with PdVSA. New drilling is not authorized. New equipment contracts that go beyond genuine maintenance scope are not authorized.

The line between maintenance and production is not always obvious in practice, and compliance teams at the named companies spend significant resources mapping specific field activities to the maintenance-only standard. The key test is whether the activity preserves and sustains existing infrastructure, or whether it advances production capacity. The former falls within GL 8M's scope; the latter does not.

Renewal Dynamics

Unlike GL 44A, GL 8M does not track political milestones. OFAC renews it periodically — typically on 6-to-12-month cycles — based on its own assessment of whether the maintenance authorization remains appropriate. Each renewal cycle is closely watched by the five named companies and their legal and compliance teams, since a failure to renew would require an immediate operational wind-down. Historically, OFAC has continued to renew GL 8M, but the terms and conditions have evolved over successive iterations. Always check the current OFAC text rather than relying on a prior version of the license.

For production and trading activities beyond maintenance, the relevant current authorization is GL 46 (for established U.S. entities). See our OFAC General License 46 guide for that framework, or compare the broader landscape in our OFAC General License 41 vs 46 comparison.

Sources: OFAC Venezuela-Related Sanctions (GL 8M)

Choosing the Right License

The question of which license applies to a given activity turns on two threshold inquiries: who is the entity, and what is the activity? GL 44A and GL 8M occupy different lanes on both dimensions.

You are looking at GL 44A if…

  • Your entity is not one of the five named companies in GL 8M.
  • Your activity involves oil or gas sector operations — production, lifting, export, or related services.
  • You have verified that GL 44A is currently active on OFAC's Venezuela page.
  • You have confirmed Venezuela's current compliance status with the Barbados Agreement commitments.
  • You have screened all counterparties against the current SDN list.

You are looking at GL 8M if…

  • Your entity is Chevron Corporation, Halliburton, Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes, or Weatherford.
  • Your activity is maintenance of existing PdVSA operations — upkeep, equipment servicing, infrastructure preservation.
  • You are not producing, lifting, or trading oil.
  • You are not entering new contracts beyond the maintenance scope.
  • You have verified the current GL 8M renewal status with OFAC.

There are scenarios where both licenses may be relevant to the same company. Chevron, for instance, is named in GL 8M for maintenance purposes but may also look to GL 44A (when active) for broader operational activities. In those cases, the activity type — not the company identity — determines which license applies to a specific transaction.

Both licenses share a hard limit neither can override: new exploration and new investment in the Venezuelan oil sector are not authorized. If your business plan requires either, no current general license covers it. You would need a specific license from OFAC, which requires an affirmative licensing application and is granted only in limited circumstances.

Need a documented compliance analysis for a specific deal or counterparty? Our team builds tailored sanctions dossiers that map your activity to the current OFAC text. You can also start with our Venezuela sanctions checker or consult the full license inventory in our OFAC Venezuela General Licenses tool. For the broader sanctions picture, the Venezuela Sanctions Tracker provides ongoing coverage of program developments.

Frequently Asked Questions

GL 44A's status is tied to Venezuela's political situation and Barbados Agreement compliance. It has experienced on-again, off-again periods — verify current issuance status on OFAC's Venezuela-Related Sanctions page before relying on it for any transaction.
GL 8M names exactly five companies: Chevron Corporation, Halliburton, Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes, and Weatherford. No other U.S. company can operate under GL 8M, regardless of experience or qualifications.
No. Even when GL 44A is fully in force, it does not authorize new exploration, new drilling, or new investment in Venezuela's oil sector. New joint ventures also fall outside the license's scope.
Yes, in some cases. A named GL 8M company like Chevron may also rely on GL 44A for broader operational activity when it is active. The activity type — not the company identity — determines which license applies to a specific transaction.
Activities authorized under GL 44A become unlawful immediately upon expiration. Compliance teams must monitor OFAC's Venezuela page closely because OFAC does not always provide significant advance notice of expiration or non-renewal.